Page 1 of 1

isn't it possible to set "vpls" on "xrv" or "xrv9k"?

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2019 8:12 am
by taku
hi

isn't it possible to set "vpls" on "xrv" or "xrv9k"?

the following message was output.

thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#show configuration failed

!! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
!! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
!! errors with each failed configuration command can be
!! found below.


l2vpn
bridge group BG
bridge-domain VLAN100
storm-control multicast kbps 10000
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
storm-control broadcast kbps 10000
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
interface Bundle-Ether100.100
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.100
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
!
!
bridge-domain VLAN200
storm-control multicast kbps 10000
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
storm-control broadcast kbps 10000
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
interface Bundle-Ether100.200
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.200
!!% Invalid argument: VPLS Bridge domains not supported on this platform
!
!

Re: isn't it possible to set "vpls" on "xrv" or "xrv9k"?

Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 1:05 pm
by rene0815
Hi,

VPLS is not supported on XRv.
You need to fall back to a pyhsical router for this.

Cheers

Re: isn't it possible to set "vpls" on "xrv" or "xrv9k"?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:35 pm
by NitrousOxyde
Actually VPLS config is supported on XRv, but because it is offloaded to line cards, data plane will fail while control plane will work and prefixes will be exchanged. If you want to play with VPLS on Cisco, use CSR1k with appropriate image, it 100% supports VPLS.

Re: isn't it possible to set "vpls" on "xrv" or "xrv9k"?

Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:40 am
by rene0815
This is true for the old XRv. On XRv9000 you have a separate VM for DP, so it would be supported if Cisco wouldnt have stripped that feature from the virtual XR.
I see no point in doing VPLS stuff on IOS-XE if you deparetly are trying to get it running on IOS-XR.